Spanish Flu
The on going thoughts & musings (sometimes random, sometimes not) of Lumen Capital Management,LLC.
By Christopher R. English, President of Lumen Capital Management, LLC
I thought it would be a good time to briefly update my investment thoughts as our elections draw ever nearer. Just like when COVID-19 began wreaking havoc last spring, I may update you more frequently in the coming weeks if events warrant the extra communication.
First, I believe Mr. Biden will win in November. This is not a political statement; it’s simply me counting votes. For months I’ve been saying that I thought the President was in trouble, even before COVID-19 struck. But it’s only recently that investors seem to be coming around to my view. While it’s possible we won’t know the winner on November 3rd, I believe we are going to know sooner than many think, maybe within a few days. The polling and other anecdotal evidence is suggesting a significant Biden victory. I know all about the 2016 analogies, and they could be correct, but the old political scientist in me thinks there’s a higher probability that the pollsters are right this time around. If so, this will likely forestall a long and bitter, drawn-out decision. However, I also think there’s a high probability that the stock market will remain volatile until a winner is declared. Even if we see a political struggle that lasts longer than I expect and stocks decline around the voting, then I think that weakness will create value in good names. I also think that, regardless of the outcome, there are many possibilities for industries and sectors that have been hammered by the virus.
Also, from the market’s perspective at this point, I don’t think the potential for stocks to do well in 2021 necessarily rests on the election outcome. I believe investors will start looking past what could be some hard months regarding the virus into the new year and start anticipating what life might look like on the other side of this current spike in cases. I know this is hard to believe right now because the news regarding infections, hospitalizations, etc., is dire. Remember, though, I have always said the news cycle would get worse before it gets better. Yet, the possibility of a vaccine, better therapeutics, better preventatives (social distancing, masks, etc.), and adaptation will likely lead to some mitigation of the disease. My timeline estimate for this is by late winter or early spring. In addition, the Federal Reserve has signaled that it will remain accommodative toward the economy for an extended period of time. Finally, at some point, all the political winds point toward another massive stimulus package regardless of who is president. If President Trump wins, then we’ll see more haggling after the election. If Mr. Biden wins, then the only issue will be the size of the deal. Absent an unlooked-for event or COVID-19 mutating in a way that changes the trajectory of the disease, then I believe all the issues I’ve mentioned above could potentially lead to a better economic recovery starting in early 2021. Evidence of that is already all around us, but we could see that in a more obvious way by springtime. Furthermore, I think any economic weakness that does show up this winter will be temporary.
Year to date, the S&P 500 is up around 6%. However, the S&P 500 is not currently indicative of the overall equity environment. The economy, as well as the stock market, was derailed in February by the virus. Since then, stock leadership has been narrow and largely confined to parts of technology, certain sectors of healthcare, and some specialty sectors such as eCommerce. Most other sectors and investment styles have struggled. Anything tied to hospitality and discretionary spending has been a disaster (think movie theaters, restaurants, and vacation resorts).
There is a sizable percentage of the S&P 500 companies still trading well below their 2019 closing price. This doesn’t necessarily show up when you look at financial headlines because major market indices like the S&P 500 are weighted by their market capitalization. At the end of September, the top five companies (Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, and Facebook) were 22% of that index’s market capitalization, all of which were at the right place and right time regarding the virus. As such, these have helped propel these indices higher but have also masked much of the rest of the market’s hard times. An equal-weighted S&P index, such as the Invesco Equal Weighted S&P 500 (RSP), is a better indication of this, as is the better-known Dow Jones Industrial Average. These are basically break even for 2020.
There are many growth and value-oriented companies that have struggled because they’ve been in the wrong parts of the market due to the virus, not because there is necessarily something fundamentally wrong with their underlying businesses. Many of these stocks have continued to pay their dividends, which overflows into the Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) space where we participate. It is highly probable that many of these securities, as well as the ETFs that hold them, are significantly undervalued right now and have the potential for above-average total returns when the economy recovers. Again, I think we’ll see evidence of that by next spring. We have either begun to make investments in these areas, added to positions where we already have a presence, or are doing research on how to get additional exposure in these sectors.
I invest money for clients through investment strategies that utilize ETFs. I believe you own ETFs for three purposes in terms of their growth potential: capital appreciation, dividends, and expected future dividend increases. 2020 has put some of this potential on hold, but assuming the virus becomes a manageable event, then it is highly probable these growth characteristics could resume next year. Therefore, regardless of the next few weeks and assuming we’re on the winning track versus COVID-19, I believe prospects continue to be brighter for 2021.
Finally, while I have given you my current perspective on the markets and what the near future might hold, I want you to know that I stand ready to change my assessments if I feel the facts have changed. I also stand ready to reevaluate my overall views and portfolio positioning if necessary.
If you have any questions about ETFs or how we create and manage your portfolio, please reach out to me at 312.953.8825 or by email at lumencapital@hotmail.com.
*Long indices related to the S&P 500 in client and personal accounts.
Christopher R. English is the President and founder of Lumen Capital Management, LLC-a Registered Investment Advisor regulated by the State of Illinois. A copy of our ADV Part II is available upon request. We manage portfolios for investors, developing customized portfolios that reflect a client’s unique risk/reward parameters. We also manage a private partnership currently closed to outside investors. Mr. English has over three decades of experience working with individuals, families, businesses, and foundations. Based in the greater Chicago area, he serves clients throughout Illinois, as well as Florida, Massachusetts, California, Indiana, and other states. To schedule a complimentary portfolio review, contact Chris today by calling 312.953.8825 or emailing him at lumencapital@hotmail.com.
The Novel Coronavirus is the reason more than any other out there why I think the President is in trouble, especially in those Midwest swing states he barely won four years ago. This from the Wall Street Journal yesterday.
"Some 69% of Americans believe that the country could have dealt with Covid-19 more effectively, and 65% disapprove of how President Trump has handled the disease, including 61% of seniors, 65% of Americans in Sunbelt swing states and 66% in Rust Belt swing states. Mr. Trump’s attacks on governors and mayors who have adopted strong measures to contain the disease are unlikely to change many minds: 76% of Americans—including 56% of Republicans—believe that actions such as shutdowns and mask mandates by state and local officials are reasonable steps to protect public health and safety, not unreasonable restrictions on individual liberty."
These are not good numbers for the President. I'll repeat what I've said for many months, it will fly against modern historic norms for a sitting President {regardless of political party} to get reelected during an economic contraction. A depression destroyed Herbert Hoover in 1928, recessions likely cost Jimmy Carter in 1980 and George Bush reelection in 1992. They also contributed mightily to denying Richard Nixon the White House in 1960 and John McCain in 2008. Both men were in essence asking for a 3rd term for the existing President during an economic contraction. Now you have numbers that show a large plurality of the public disproving how a sitting President has dealt with the pandemic. I think these numbers spell trouble for him.
Again I don't do politics on this blog. I point this out because I care about economic policy and how it relates to the investments I make for my clients. You are free to agree or disagree with me. I also am open to the possibility that this analysis is wrong. I've seen articles that do a pretty go job of saying why and how the President can pull another November surprise. I also think investors have factored in scenarios for whichever party takes the White House. I believe the markets at this point can spin a positive story regardless of who wins. However, polling numbers and historical precedent do not lie and the polling data above is troubling for Mr. Trump no matter which side of the political aisle you prefer.
Back next week.
Link: "American Values Portend Trump's Defeat" {Paywall}
The 10-year US Treasury bond trades at basically 3/4s of 1% {.75}. A 30-year US bond yields slightly over 1.5% right now. Such low yields are one of the reasons that stocks can trade at valuation levels that would normally be worrisome. At what level do interest rates become a problem for the stock market and the economy? I don't know and obviously right now that seems like a problem off well into the future. But think about it for a second. We have borrowed trillions to fight the virus and will ultimately end up borrowing trillions more. At what point do the public debts of the US start to concern the investment community. My guess is you have to see the 10-year well over 2% and the long bond nearing 4% for bonds to start becoming serious competition for stocks. That's probably not going to happen anytime soon.
When you buy bonds at such low yields you are saying that you are willing to park your money in an investment that will likely not even keep up with inflation over the life of the bond just to get your principal back. Contrast that with a simple S&P 500 ETF. These currently have dividend yields slightly under 2% with a chance to also see those dividends grow over time. You also get the potential for growth when the economy improves that has historically been in the 4-6% range. If I had that choice then to me the obvious longer term choice is the ETF. You do, however, have to be able to live with the market's volatility. If you've done a proper asset allocation and have a solid understanding of your own personal risk/reward scenario this volatility is easier to live with.
Back Thursday.
*Long ETFs related to the S&P 500 in client and personal accounts.
The S&P 500 year to date is up around 9% for the year. The Nasdaq composite is up nearly 30%. These look like stunning returns for stocks when taken at their face value. However, don't let the major averages fool you. The economy as well as the stock market was derailed in February by the virus. Since then stock market leadership has been narrow and largely confined to technology, certain sectors of health care and some specialty sectors such as eCommerce. Most other sectors and investment styles have struggled. Anything tied to consumer discretionary spending for example has been a disaster. There is a sizeable percentage of the S&P 500 companies still trading well below their 2019 closing price. Here's why this doesn't necessarily show up when you just look at the financial headlines. Major market indices like the S&P 500 are weighted by their market capitalization {market cap}. Apple for example currently comprises about 6% of the S&P 500’s market cap. At the end of September, the top ten companies in the S&P 500 comprised nearly 30% of the index’s market cap. The top five companies, {Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet and Facebook} were 22% of that index’s market cap. As such, these have helped propel these indices higher but have also masked much of the rest of the market’s hard times. An equal weighted S&P index such as the Invesco Equal Weighted S&P 500 {RSP} is a better indication of this as is the better-known Dow Jones Industrial Average. These are basically break even for 2020.
While many of these stocks that have growth but are in the wrong parts of the market right now or value oriented names have struggled this year, I'll point out that many have continued to pay their dividends which overflows into the Exchange Traded Funds {ETF} space. It is also highly probable that many of these securities as well as the ETFs that hold them are significantly undervalued right now and have the potential to come back when the economy recovers, again likely next year. Most of these struggling sectors and companies in 2020 have done so because of the disease, and not because there is necessarily something fundamentally wrong with what they do.
There has been a consistent bid under the markets these past few months. All pullbacks have been met by buyers. I believe this is because investors are looking through the elections and are starting to sense that perhaps this winter won’t be as bad as many fear. The possibility of a vaccine, better therapeutics, better preventatives {social distancing, masks etc.} and adaptation will likely lead to some mitigation I’m guessing by late winter or early spring. In addition, the Federal Reserve has signaled that it will remain accommodative towards the economy for an extended period of time and at some point there is going to be a massive stimulus package.
Further stimulus is being signaled regardless of who is President. If President Trump wins then we’ll see more haggling after the election. If Mr. Biden wins then the only issue will be the size of the deal. Absent an unlooked-for event or Covid mutating in some manner that changes the trajectory of the disease then I believe all the issues I’ve mentioned above should potentially lead to an economic recovery starting in 2021. Evidence of that is all around us but should be more readily apparent by springtime. Retail sales which came in much stronger than expected this morning for September further supports my case.
I believe Mr. Biden will win in November. This is not a political statement; it’s me simply counting votes. I have been saying this for months, but investors seem to finally be coming around to this view in recent weeks. However, I don’t think it matters from the market’s perspective at this point whether President Trump or Mr. Biden wins for stocks to potentially do well in 2021.
I invest money for clients through investment strategies that utilize ETFs. I believe you own ETFs for three purposes in terms of their growth potential. These are capital appreciation, dividends and expected future dividend increases. 2020 has put some of this potential on hold but assuming the virus becomes a manageable event then it is highly probable these growth characteristics could resume next year.
I will be traveling at the end of next week so expect only light posting over the next 10 days or so.
*Long indices related to the Nasdaq Composite and the S&P 500 in client and personal accounts. Long RSP in client and personal accounts.
A few things I've come across in the last few days. The first, from an excellent article on Fox News by Pew Research, contains a chart on financial news outlets. It turns out that for many people where they get their news mirrors their political leanings. Here's the chart. Now go see where you fit.
I tend to read a lot of different things during the day, however, mostly related to economic news. Most of the news coverage I watch at night is local. Most of the day I have the TV tuned to CNBC, which while obviously concerned with politics in how it relates to business and the markets, avoids any obvious political bias. I found it interesting that the major US news outlets and the Wall Street Journal are probably closer to the average US adult than most might imagine. It's also interesting to me that while Fox News is a powerhouse on the right, the evidence from media sources seems to show that some of the more leftist leaning outlets listed above struggle to make money.
Also if you're trying to figure out what your risk factors for contracting Covid might be going forward for various indoor activities then there is a basic app for that. Go download the MyCOVIDRisk app. It is a very basic outline of various activities and a probabilistic assessment of the risk you take by doing them. For instance I profiled running outdoors by myself with no mask {low risk} and a three hour indoor home visit with up to six friends in River Forest {high}. It's not perfect and a lot of it is common sense based on what we know today. However, it's a start for trying to figure out what might be safe or not as we move more indoors up here in the north.
Back Friday.
Richard Joseph English
We've seen a pretty solid move in the major indices the past two weeks. This flies in the face of a lot of economic data that seems to indicate at best the recovery may not be as strong as was recently thought. Quickly what I think is happening is that the markets are pricing in not only a Biden win but the likelihood of the Democrats controlling the Presidency, House and Senate come next year. To Wall Street that means there is increasingly a higher probability of much more fiscal stimulus in the new year. Even if the President wins reelection I think the markets believe we'll see more stimulus in 2021 to try and get the economy back on track.
Add into that the likelihood of a vaccine and better therapeutics coming against Covid, as well as positive seasonal characteristics, and you have a higher probability of stocks advancing now through the end of the year. There's trillions of dollars looking for an investment home and some of that money's probably coming into stocks in the next few months.
Of course I could be wrong, but at a minimum then I'd think stocks will just mark time. You probably need a really bad piece of unexpected news to derail the positives right now.
Stocks are a little overbought in the short term so we might see some backing and filling but in the voting machine that is the markets, it's increasingly looking like Mr. Biden is going to win.
Of course we'll have to see and that's why they have elections.
Back sometime in the middle of next week.
I don't even know where to begin on all the news regarding the President becoming infected with Covid last week, his subsequent hospitalization and his discharge yesterday. I am not interested in the political spin as there are many, many places you can go read on the web for that. What interests me the most right now is that the President was able to return to the White House yesterday afternoon. Now the cynical response is that Mr. Trump is in the political fight of his life and with the election looming felt he had no choice but to at least be back at the White House. Whether you like the President or not, it's hard for me to believe any sitting President this close to what is still considered by many to be a closely fought affair would not make the same decision he did. Americans like their presidents to be healthy and Mr. Trump wouldn't be the first one to prioritize politics over their own personal wellbeing. Besides he will still be receiving world class medical care while recuperating.
This explanation holds water regardless of any other possibility, yet we also need to be open to the probability that whatever therapeutic treatment being supplied to the President was at a minimum able to alleviate his symptoms so he could fight the disease or was possibly able to reduce the viral load to the point his own immune system could win the battle. While the information has been spotty, it seems Mr. Trump was admitted to Walter Reed Hospital with at least moderate to more advanced symptoms of Covid and that he was given oxygen therapy at least once, possibly twice. We have also been told the following about his treatment. That he was given remdesivir, an antiviral drug that's been show to help certain hospitalized Covid patients. That he was also given on Friday an experimental cocktail of drugs developed by the biotech company Regeneron*. Finally, on Saturday he was given the drug dexamethasone which tries to prevent an immune system overreaction in some Covid patients.
I don't want to get to far into the weeds on the President's medical treatment. It's possible his condition was deteriorating rapidly and his doctor's threw the equivalent of the medical kitchen sink at him. However, we also need to be open to the potential that what we're seeing is the beginning of the development of a better series of therapeutic treatments that will ultimately trickle down into the general population. Remember therapeutics are part of what we're going to need in order to win the war against this virus. Let's be open to the possibility that we're starting to get a better handle on that and perhaps the President is proof. We'll know in regards to him at least over the next few weeks.
*Regeneron is a holding in certain ETFs we hold in client and personal accounts.
By Christopher R. English, President of Lumen Capital Management, LLC
We have now officially flipped the calendar from summer to autumn, although habitually, for most Americans, fall arrives the Tuesday after Labor Day or whenever the NFL starts playing. Chicago’s September, traditionally our best weather month, has been warm and dry. Unfortunately, we’ve now waved goodbye to all that as the first major batch of cold Canadian air has invaded the Midwest, likely meaning a farewell for the most part to warmer temps.
Historically, autumn typically evoked a certain amount of dread in humans living in places that experienced significant variations in the seasons. Fall was the make-or-break time of crop harvesting, while the bitter cold was often feared in the era before central heating was invented. While times have changed, some of us may be feeling that dread as we face the uncertainties of the next few months. But there are those who don’t seem all that uncertain: the pundits and prognosticators. They seem to know exactly what’s about to occur with the virus, the election, and the financial markets. They’re constantly telling us how much they know and what must surely occur. I say let’s consider a few alternatives.
Those same prognosticators say that the coming cooler months for us in the North are going to be a time of social hardship as the virus forces us to spend more time locked up, just like last spring. Could be, but here's my guess: winter won’t be normal, but I also don’t think it will be as difficult as what we experienced earlier this year. Here’s my view.
You may not like this, but I think COVID-19 is here to stay. I don’t believe there's any hope of completely eradicating it in the next few years, if ever. Instead, I think eventually it may be more on par with the flu. Maybe not this winter, but in future years, as we’re learning more about the virus and developing the tools to fight it. First, a vaccine is coming. It may not be as powerful as many hope, and there certainly won't be enough doses to vaccinate everyone when it first arrives, but I’m guessing that by January, you’re going to see the first pictures of people getting their COVID-19 shots. Vaccinations will move slowly at first, but I’m expecting you’ll see a pick-up in availability as the winter progresses. This alone may not be enough to lessen people’s worry about the disease, but it should be an enormous psychological boost in the months ahead.
Second, we have better therapeutics today. I don’t want to get the COVID-19, but if I’m going to come down with the virus, I’d rather get it today than when it first appeared last January. We know so much more about it now compared to last winter. Similarly, if I’m going to contract the virus, I’d rather come down with it six months from now because we’re going to know even more then. Better therapeutics also means a better chance of you not being severely impacted if you’re infected. Better therapeutics and perhaps a belief that the virus isn’t something akin to a death sentence should make people more confident about being out and about.
That being said, testing is the key to reopening the economy. To get things moving again, you have to convince people who have money that it’s safe to go out and spend it. The best way to do that until we have medical backup is by mass testing, and it’s coming. Abbott Laboratories* recently told us they now have a rapid test that's 97% accurate. You take their test and the results are then downloaded to a smartphone app that you can use to prove to people that have tested negative for the disease. Testing supply is limited right now, but that should improve in the months ahead. Other companies are working on rapid testing as well. My guess is that by late this year, you will start seeing regulatory approval for at-home testing devices where the results are nearly instantaneous and also downloaded to a device like your smartphone.
Imagine how much more comfortable you would feel going out if you could enter a crowded restaurant and know that all the guests around you, as well as the staff, have tested negative for the virus. They already are doing that in Wuhan and other parts of China. It may not yet work as well as advertised over there, but think about what that could potentially mean if there is an easy way to get tested at home, maybe every day. Think about what being able to have mass testing would do for many sectors of the U.S. economy. Besides restaurants, you could get on a plane again, go to a sporting or cultural event, even go on vacation to a resort or a cruise if you could be confident that those you come into contact with aren’t carrying the virus. Testing is the game-changer and the way I believe we’ll finally get the upper hand on the virus.
Humans have survived as a species because of our ability to adapt to our surroundings. We are adapting to this disease. Masks, social distancing, and temperature tests are all the norm right now. Expect this to carry over into winter. You might not eat outside in subzero weather at a restaurant, but you might be willing to eat under a well-ventilated and heated tent. Yes, it might not be as warm as you’d like, but if the choice is wearing an extra layer of clothing or staying at home, some might opt for the sweater. Adaptation will be the new normal and we’ll likely figure out ways to go about our business as the months pass. Life will likely never be as it was before the virus, but whatever the new normal will end up being, I think it can be pretty close to how life was back then, especially with a few adjustments. As we find that new normal, life and the economy will improve.
Let’s go back to those prognosticators. They say that people are going to be content hunkering down working in their homes forever. Somehow, they just know that nobody wants to go back to work again in person or ever go out again, for that matter. Could be, but I wonder how many are starting to express the same thoughts as passed on to me recently by a businessperson who said he couldn’t wait to get back into his office. He was tired of working from home. Now, maybe that person doesn’t want to go back to the old 9-5 routine, but I’ll bet many people in this country are itching to get back out there in the world. This may become especially true as summer wanes here in the North and people begin to contemplate months of being cooped up again. There’s been much speculation on the death of the office, but I’m not sure I’d put all those towers up for sale yet if I owned one.
They also say the election is going to be a disaster, that there’s no way we’re going to know who wins anytime soon after the voting is over and the whole thing is going to devolve into a mess. The President is supposedly laying the groundwork for a challenge to practically every state he loses in if the results don’t go his way. Heck, he might not even leave office if he loses! Could be, but here’s what the polls are saying.
If the election were held today, polling suggests Mr. Biden would likely win between 280-300 electoral votes. He only needs 270. What’s more, he’s leading in practically all the swing states that he’ll need to win the election. Now, the election isn’t today and this isn’t a political commercial. It’s taking a look at the current batch of data. Certainly, things can change, but I think the first two debates will pretty much crystalize the election. Swing voters are likely leaning toward Mr. Biden but need to feel comfortable in their choice. Joe’s gotta close the deal with them, I believe. Assuming the debates don’t go poorly for Mr. Biden, then the polls aren’t adding up for the President. If he loses by what the numbers currently indicate, then it would be hard for him to claim the election was either rigged or stolen. Certainly, it would be hard for him to make a convincing argument for that beyond his base. Time will tell.
Finally, they say the stock market is overvalued and must have a major correction. Could be, but I’ve said for some time that I expected the markets to become more volatile as we get closer to the election, so I’m not surprised at what we’ve been seeing. Besides the upcoming vote, add in how far certain sectors have moved since this spring, plus normal market seasonality, and you get the perfect recipe for stocks to move into a digestive phase. So far, at its worst moments last week, major indices were down close to 10% from their recent highs, but still have seen major increases since their March lows. This decline at its worst has basically taken us back to the beginning of August. It’s been a normal pullback so far, which is healthy as we’re removing some of the speculative froth from the markets.
There are a few sectors of the market that are overvalued by traditional metrics, but much of the market, like the economy, is still significantly lower than where it began the year. One could argue that for the main street economy, we are more likely approaching the point in a recessionary cycle where things are just starting to turn positive. If that's the case, then these sectors are possibly the next leaders in the markets even if the highfliers take a breather. Again, time will tell. Finally, regarding the markets, anybody who tells you they know for sure what’s going to happen the rest of this year, or even into 2021 for that matter, is dissembling at best. Nobody can know even in a more normal year, and this one definitely doesn’t qualify for that description. Make sure your portfolios are in tune with your risk/reward parameters and timelines.
Too many are certain they know the future. I say, consider potential alternatives. Consider an economy that continues the growth we’ve seen since the worst of things last spring, as well as better investment fundamentals. Consider better individual and business confidence if we start to believe we’re getting the upper hand on the virus. Also, take into account an election that potentially isn’t as divisive as many expect. All of these factors could be good for growth and have the potential to be good for stocks over the next 12 to 18 months. Evidence of green economic shoots has been showing up for months. A dose of the possibilities I’ve described above could be just what the doctor ordered…as well as an effective vaccine!
Finally, there is a central principle I hold that I’ve discussed several times with you (see here and here) that there is more that unites us as a nation than the press and popular culture would have you believe. Turns out, I may be on to something. Harvard’s Carr Center for Human Rights and Institute of Politics recently ran a survey and found that more than 7 in 10 believe they have more in common with one another than many think. One of the key findings in that poll was that “A majority of Americans are fed up with polarization and looking for ways to reimagine the values they have in common—the rights and responsibilities important to being an American today.” This is only one poll and some might question its accuracy, but it’s closer with what I see than what you’ll find out there in the public domain. You can read about the poll here if you’re so inclined.
As always, stay safe and healthy and reach out to me with any questions at 312.953.8825 or email us at lumencapital@hotmail.com.
Christopher R. English is the President and founder of Lumen Capital Management, LLC-a Registered Investment Advisor regulated by the State of Illinois. A copy of our ADV Part II is available upon request. We manage portfolios for investors, developing customized portfolios that reflect a client’s unique risk/reward parameters. We also manage a private partnership currently closed to outside investors. Mr. English has over three decades of experience working with individuals, families, businesses, and foundations. Based in the greater Chicago area, he serves clients throughout Illinois, as well as Florida, Massachusetts, California, Indiana, and other states. To schedule a complimentary portfolio review, contact Chris today by calling 312.953.8825 or emailing him at lumencapital@hotmail.com.
*Abbott Labs is a holding in certain ETFs we hold in client and personal accounts.