Monday, November 30, 2009

an tSionna 11.30.09



The markets took a dive while I was away regarding a liquidity issue in Dubai. I've listened to people discuss this from a bullish & bearish posture. My take from studying the money flows is shown above. Basically we have an overbought market that took a "sell the news" approach to this bad news on Friday. Of course we might end up having a real crisis on our hands but for now I think we'll treat this as nothing big from a money flow perspective and see how it plays out this week.

*Long ETFs related to the S&P 500 in client and personal accounts.

Intended for informational use only. Not to be considered investment advice! Please consult your own advisore before considering any of our investment thoughts, do your own homework or better yet hire us!

Why The Market Went Down So Much: Earnings


Chart of the Day chronicles last year's earnings decline.
"With a large majority of third-quarter earnings in the books (87% of S&P 500 companies have reported for Q3 2009), {this} chart provides some long-term perspective to the current earnings environment by focusing on 12-month, as reported S&P 500 earnings. Today's chart illustrates how earnings declined over 92% from its Q3 2007 peak to its Q3 2009 trough, which makes it easily the largest decline on record (the data goes back to 1936). On the positive side, S&P 500 earnings bottomed and are moving up sharply."
*Long ETFs related to the S&P 500 in client and personal accounts.
Link: https://www.chartoftheday.com/orderform.htm (subscription required).

Sunday, November 29, 2009

USPS Bleeds Red!

We've chronicled the coming travails of the US Postal Service in this past post here: http://lumencapital.blogspot.com/2009/06/going-postal.html Now Direxion Funds in their "By The Numbers" series puts these problems into monetary focus.

BLAME THE INTERNET - In the current 2010 fiscal year (i.e., the 12 months from 10/01/09 to 9/30/10), the US Postal Service expects to lose $7.8 billion. Total mail volume in the 2010 fiscal year is projected to be 166 billion pieces of mail, down nearly 37 billion pieces since fiscal year 2008 (source: Postal Service).

Link:
http://marketing2.direxionfunds.com/?elqPURLPage=7&elq=58536c6fa6ee4143a06acb9726d6fc88

Saturday, November 28, 2009

Notre Dame Vs. Stanford.

Notre Dame takes the bitter dregs of an ultimately failed season into Stanford for the final game of the regular season (apparently they're bowl eligible still). It is likely to be Charlie Weis' last game as well. Stanford's Jim Harbaugh (pictured above) is one of the names mentioned as his successor. Here's how I see the game. The most obvious scenario would be for the Irish, demoralized as they already are, to get pummelled by a superior Stanford club. The other and unlooked for scenario is for them to ride a wave of emotion and pull off the upset. I'm unfortunately thinking scenario one is the more likely result. By the way I have a $5.00 bet with my brother-in-law on this game so I hope the Irish at least hold the Cardinal under the spread!
Edh Charlie slan agus dia dhuit!

Thursday, November 26, 2009

Happy Thanksgiving!



Happy Thanksgiving to each and every one of you! It is my profound hope that you are able to spend this day with friends and loved ones eating to your hearts content. Watching or even playing a little football is also fun. Eat, drink & be merry! Again Happy Thanksgiving.
PS. I heard the other day on the radio that the average American consumes over 4,500 calories on Thanksgiving. I plan to do my part today!

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Taking Some Time Off


We're going to be away for the Thanksgiving holiday. Expect posting to be light to non-existent until Tuesday of next week.

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

What Warren's Been Doing.

We recently updated Warren Buffett's performance since he published his famous editorial about buying stocks last year. http://lumencapital.blogspot.com/2009/11/tsionna-warren-buffett.html 24/7 Wall Street took a look at Buffett's recent filings and came away with some interesting thoughts. I thought I'd excerpt this and throw my two cents in @ the end. Highlights are mine.
This was an important week for investment guru and billionaire watchers to see which gurus were holding which stocks. The full public equity holdings of Warren Buffett via Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE: BRK-A) were particularly of note, particularly with those B shares under “BRK-B” soon to split and giving a chance for even the less astute ranks of Joe Public to own a piece of the Berkshire dream. Obviously the huge change is via the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. (NYSE: BNI) buyout.....The rail transport play now accounts for about one-quarter of the total Berkshire Hathaway entity upon closing. But the less obvious position in that Warren Buffett in 2009 has made it clear that there will be a simpler and probably less “stock-hound” version of Berkshire Hathaway ahead.
Buffett has been going higher up the food chain and is likely to be a creditor now inside or to large institutions. We have seen this during the crisis.
Buffett negotiated a better deal for Goldman Sachs Group (NYSE: GS) than the US Government was able to get. Buffett’s preferred stock in Goldman Sachs has a dividend of 10% and is callable at any time at a 10% premium; but Buffett also got warrants to purchase $5 billion of common stock with a strike price of $115.00 per share, exercisable for a five-year term (4 years now), and Buffett would effectively get to pocket $61 per share if he exercised those all today at the market (and with a $2.6 billion warrant profit alone).
{in regards to} General Electric Co. (NYSE: GE) {Buffett's}stake was listed only as 7.77 million shares of common stock (about $125 million now), the same as it has been for quarters. Yet last year Buffett came to the rescue with a $3 billion of perpetual preferred stock in a private offering with a dividend of 10% and warrants to purchase $3 billion of common stock. The preferred is callable after 3-years (2 years now) at a 10% premium; the warrants have a strike price of $22.25 and are exercisable for a five-year term (4 years now).Two other
investments in preferred or note offerings made in the last year during the financial crunch were in Tiffany & Co. (NYSE: TIF) in February via 10% senior notes and in Harley-Davidson, Inc. (NYSE: HOG) with a 15% rate. Neither of these are in the Buffett equity holdings.......
Buffett increased his holdings in Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE: WMT).....With over 10% officially unemployed in the U.S., Wal-Mart has become the shopping destination of millions more of Americans and that value and thrift trend is not likely to end any time soon.
Then there is the ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) bet that Buffett got his timing very wrong on. He cut his stake again....and still has the tax benefit for selling. He added Exxon Mobil Corp. (NYSE: XOM) with a 1.27 million share stake. As Exxon is the largest company by market cap at $357 billion, this is much easier for Buffett to invest into rather than $79 billion market cap today in ConocoPhillips.....
The Wells Fargo & Company (NYSE: WFC) stake which he grew yet again is worth over $8.7 billion...
Then there are the overseas bets, and these are just some:
$2.5 billion into diversified Swiss Reinsurance Co. Ltd.
$4 billion to buy control of Iscar Metalworking in Israel
$230 million for a 10% stake in BYD for electric batteries in China
$144 million or so stake in Nestle
Buffett lent $4.4 billion to Mars for the Wrigley buyout. He also lent Dow Chemical (NYSE: DOW) $3 billion for part of the Rohm & Haas deal. As noted earlier, Buffett is going higher up the food chain.
In fact, he is almost becoming the default alternative investment bank. And he has been cutting down and exiting equity positions as well.
....This now makes Berkshire Hathaway even more of a financial and transport operation, with far less emphasis on public common stock bets. And he is going higher on the food chain.......{W}hat is obvious is that he is starting to get out of the way of some bets and make more concentrated bets elsewhere.
The new Berkshire Hathaway is more of a financial and transportation operator now… more than ever… that is also acting as private investment banker. The investment changes over the last year are showing more of a penchant for debt and being higher up the food chain than just common stock in the U.S.
This all acts to make Berkshire Hathaway more predictable in operations and even more of a true conglomerate. And it makes the passive investments a bit more opaque.


Link: http://247wallst.com/2009/11/19/the-more-focused-and-more-opaque-buffett-berkshire-hathaway-brk-a-brk-b-bni-unp-nsc-gs-ge-tif-hog-wmt-cop-xom-wfc-rsg-dow-etn-wbc-mco-wlp-unh-gsk-sny-gci-wpo/#more-53980
*Long General Electric, Exxon, & Wells Fargo in certain legacy accounts. No direct positions in any of the other stocks mentioned however it is likely that they are all in certain ETFs that I own for client and individual accounts.

Monday, November 23, 2009

an tSionna 11.23.09


Market Update. One thing that's not on this chart is that seasonal factors should be positive for stocks between now and the end of the year. Whether that means more gains or that stocks will simply hold steady in the face of end of the year profit taking is to be seen.
*Long ETFs related to the S&P 500 for client and personal accounts.

Sunday, November 22, 2009

Another Money Flow Example


I was asked by a friend to do an analysis of a stock he was interested in buying. Since I spent the time working on this, I thought that I would place it on the board as another example of how we use money flow analysis to spot opportunities. Please note that I've attempted to remove all the pieces of information that would identify this company as I want this to be an illustration of our work. I don't want it to be perceived as a recommendation to buy or sell this security. As of this writing I do not own any of this either personally or for clients although that could change. If you are a casual reader of this blog please do your own homework or consult your own investment advisor if you can somehow figure out which security this is.

Saturday, November 21, 2009

Notre Dame vs. U Conn

Senior Day in South Bend as the 4-5 U Conn Huskies come calling. This is a must win game for Coach Weis. I figure he has to win here, at Stanford next weekend and any possible Bowl game in order to keep his job. We'll see. I think the Irish win here and lose to Stanford next week in Palo Alto finishing the year at 7-5. That's a long way from my early fall guesstimate of 9-3!

Deora Ar Mo Chroi!

Friday, November 20, 2009

Kass On Quantative Trading

One of the hidden influences on stocks in recent years is a new type of algorithmic program trading. It has become one of the main players on Wall Street. Tuesday The Street.com's Doug Kass weighed in on "Quant's" growing influence in the market. Excerpt below. Highlights mine.
"When the music stops, in terms of liquidity, things will be complicated. But as long as the music is playing, you've got to get up and dance. We're still dancing."
-- Chuck Prince, former chairman and CEO of Citigroup (told to the Financial Times on July 10, 2007).
These words resonate to me in the current investment setting as many investors and traders are assuming the most benign of economic outcomes and have begun to dance and party like it's 1999. The media's talking heads are doing their best to fuel the celebration, just as they were at DJIA 14,000 before the market crashed last year. It is also the same group of cheerleaders that was mired in depression eight short months ago.......

.....For now, though, let's throw away the fundamentals, the Fed, talk of bubbles and opinions on the economic trajectory as there might be an outside influence that is playing an increasingly more influential role and could help to explain some of the persistency of the market's advance since the summer.
A portion of the sharp rise in several asset classes over the past few months could be the dominance of quant funds that worship at the altar of price momentum (and the self-fulfilling prophecy of the fund flows that follow the price momentum induced by the quants!).
Over the course of the past few weeks, I have investigated the increased role of momentum-based and
high-frequency-trading quant funds. Though hard to "quantify," I believe that the disproportionate role of these funds, which use algorithmic formulas in their directional trading strategy, is shockingly influential in the current momentum-based climate and is serving as an "invisible hand."
By some estimates, this price-momentum-based quant trading now has doubled in significance since early in the year, to more than two-thirds of the average day's trading. Trades initiated by these funds are insensitive to an underemployment rate approaching 18%, signs of an unsteady recovery in housing, the prospects for higher marginal tax rates and how we are going to finance our budget deficit, which hurdles ever higher....
The trade of shorting the U.S. dollar, buying long-dated assets like bonds and stocks, and barreling into commodities (read: gold) and other non-dollar assets is impervious to fundamentals and is likely contributing (in part) to bubble-like conditions in several asset classes. And stocks have benefited from this wave.....
If you don't believe me about the growing quant fund influence, speak to any prominent institutional trader or salesman: They will tell you that their business with plain vanilla institutions is weak and that the quant funds are the ever growing whales of trading.
The pattern is all-too familiar as a new marginal buyer of an asset class dominates the market until they don't.
Here is an anecdote that underscores the changing landscape and is reminiscent of other sectors hiring at tops. (To refresh your memory, this occurred several years ago in private equity and was followed by a sharp cyclical decline in private-equity deals.) At any rate, a subscriber wrote me a telling note recently about his son's friend who attends Wharton and is "a genius in math and game theory." He was just hired by a high-frequency trading firm after being interviewed by 15 similarly talented employees at the firm. He is 20 years old and has been offered approximately $100,000 a year, with a bonus that can add up to an additional $100,000 a quarter! That's far better than even the estimable Goldman Sachs (GS) pays!
......Remember, it is some of the same momentum-based quant funds that sold in March 2009 that have been buying over the past few months.
I have seen many bubbles in my 30-plus years in the investment business. There is a giant bubble in quant funds, and their outsized influence in buying stocks, bonds and commodities might soon be approaching the height its of popularity.
As was the case when Citigroup's (C) Chuck Prince was dancing in 2007, we never know when and how these trends extinguish themselves. We do know, however, that any serious break in momentum in some of the bubblicious asset classes (perhaps caused by economic disappointment) could precipitate indigestion within the quant fund industry that could weigh on the stock market, more so than many now believe possible.

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Financial Planning Magazine On ETFs

A very good article in "Financial Planning Magazine" on ETFs. It's very lengthy so I've excerpted this down to the main concepts about ETFs. To read the whole article including a more thorough discussion on leveraged ETFs, bond ETFs and on actively managed ETFs I'd suggest going to the link and reading the whole story. Highlights are mine as usual. Comment @ the end.

ETFs' Glory Days
By Stacy Schultz, November 1, 2009

When State Street Global Advisors launched the first exchange-traded fund in January 1993, it was marketed primarily to institutions as a way for them to execute sophisticated trading strategies such as hedging. Finally, there was a low-cost, tax-efficient investment vehicle they could trade like a stock. ...... {W}hen the market took a turn for the worse in the summer of 2007......ETFs became the vehicle of choice. Suddenly, investors were taking real interest in the benefits of ETFs: low cost, tax efficiency, transparency and liquidity, to name a few. At a time when the market was swinging by hundreds of points a day, you could buy or sell a position and not wait for the market's close to find out the price. You could short ETFs; you could write options against them to hedge a position. Trading volumes soared ..........and ETF assets, which had been gaining heft steadily for years, hit an all-time high.
Today, 789 ETFs hold assets of $702.4 billion-a more than 90% rise over the past three years. Although this is meager compared with the $7 trillion mutual fund market, industry analysts now consider ETFs the most significant product development since mutual funds........

.....During the 18-month recession, ETFs accounted for 30% to 40% of trading volume and were the single biggest driver of flows. Thanks to educational efforts by fund providers and analysts that had been in full force long before the market began to sink, investors had begun to recognize the unique qualities ETFs offered. ....
While liquidity drew many to these funds last year, their transparency also played a key role in attracting dollars. Because they are traded on a daily exchange, ETFs must report their performance and holdings each day on the fund's website. This transparency became prized after scandals ranging from Madoff to Stanford and beyond prompted investors to demand to know where-and how-their dollars were being deployed......
.....Some of the investors who flocked to ETFs were seeking much more than a safe haven. Over the past 10 years, ETFs have also been increasingly used as substitutes for single-stock exposure, and the recession only accelerated this trend.
Investors grew wary of putting their money into any one name as even the most blue-chip of companies proved untrustworthy during the economic meltdown. "Advisors and professional investors were moving from buying the right individual equity to buying parts of the market or parts of the economic landscape, and ETFs are ideal for that," explains Michael Sapir, co-founder and CEO of ProFunds. "Most studies show that portfolios are more impacted by the sectors the securities are in than the individual securities."
Advisors themselves were slowly using ETFs as a way to diversify clients' portfolios while limiting risk. For years, advisors turned to sector mutual funds to gain this type of exposure, but as the market tanked and advisors looked for somewhere cheap and convenient to invest clients' money, ETFs took a front-row seat.......
"People are migrating to baskets of securities to implement broad themes, whether it be oil, healthcare or financial services," says Dan Dolan, director of wealth management strategies at Select Sector SPDRs. "While people used to see sector investing as risky, it's now used as a way to mitigate risk."
Advisors also used ETFs to hedge client investments against the market's erratic fluctuations.
Many invested in gold, for instance, namely SPDR Gold Shares, whose assets nearly doubled from just $18 billion last December to more than $34 billion this September......

....{A}dvisors {also} use these complex funds on a short-term basis to implement a variety of strategies ranging from mitigating risk to quickly enhancing return. And as the market shows strong signs of recovery, some advisors are even using leveraged ETFs to lure wary clients back into the market. "After a meltdown, people are hesitant to go back into the market," Sapir says. "Leveraged ETFs allow the appropriate client to inch back into the market with less principal at risk, getting a little bang for their buck on a daily basis."

But leveraged and inverse ETFs have undergone intense scrutiny this year as regulators question their suitability for most investment plans.
On June 11, FINRA issued a statement declaring, "inverse and leveraged ETFs that are reset daily typically are unsuitable for retail investors who plan to hold them for longer than one trading day, particularly in volatile markets." The statement also warned financial institutions, saying "recommendations to customers must be suitable and based on a full understanding of the terms and features of the product."
The issue at hand was that the daily compounding that occurs in these funds makes them risky to hold for more than one day during volatile markets. ........While compounding can have its upside-earning the fund enhanced exposure to a rising index-the market's recent volatility has shone a harsh light on the negative effects of compounding in these products........
{Leveraged} ETF providers are the first to insist that their products aren't for everyone.....So just how long should leveraged ETFs be held? Most analysts and providers agree that, if rebalanced often-sometimes even daily-these funds can be safely held for extended periods of time. According to Sapir, who has done extensive research on the topic, the suggested holding period of a fund is dictated by its volatility.
"On diversified indexes like the S&P 500, there's a more than 90% chance that, over a month, a 2x S&P 500 ETF could get close to its daily target. You can get reasonably close to the daily target by rebalancing approximately every three months or every 80 to 90 days," he says. "The less volatility in the index over the short-term, the longer on average you can hold it and get closer to the index and the less frequently you need to rebalance." For riskier funds, such as a 2x China ETF, Sapir recommends more frequent rebalancing......
.......No matter how you look at it-or how you use them-it's easy to see that ETFs have come a long way in their short existence. But these products are still in their infancy, with plenty of room for growth and innovation......
.....The ETF industry has made significant strides over the last 16 years, but further consolidation is a given. The five-year product explosion came to a screeching halt last year, as 50 ETFs liquidated and four providers left the space. As of Oct. 7, 112 ETFs had less than $100 million in assets and 54 held less than $50 million, leading many to wonder if the industry can support nearly 800 funds. Now its future will depend on providers' ability to develop new products, recognize growth opportunities, and overcome obstacles. "There will be more assets and fewer products," Dolan says. "The ones that stick around will be bigger than ever. It's back to basics, survival of the fittest."
Link: http://www.financial-planning.com/fp_issues/2009_11/etfs-glory-days-2664389-1.html
Comment: There is a controversy on leveraged ETFs that reset daily which I believe largely misses the forest before the trees. I will discuss this at some point but I will note today that I have used these leveraged ETFs in the past and currently do so in what I consider appropriate size and in appropriate accounts to try and limit risk. I will discuss this in more detail in a future post. We have been using ETFs since the mid 2000s and almost exclusively since 2005. It is nice to see that some of what we have been preaching and discussing with clients these past four years is now being validated in articles such as this one.
*Long ETFs related to the S&P 500 and GLD in client and personal accounts.

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Dow Rallies


Chart of the Day with an interesting perspective on historical rallies in the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
"The Dow made another rally high {last} Wednesday as it moved further above the 10,000 level. To provide some perspective to the current Dow rally that began back in March, all major market rallies of the last 109 years are plotted on today's chart. Each dot represents a major stock market rally as measured by the Dow. As today's chart illustrates, the Dow has begun a major rally 27 times over the past 109 years which equates to an average of one rally every four years. Also, most major rallies (73%) resulted in a gain of between 30% and 150% (29.8% to 150.5% to be exact) and lasted between 200 and 800 trading days (9.5 months to 3.2 years) -- highlighted in today's chart with a light blue shaded box. As it stands right now, the current Dow rally (hollow blue dot labeled you are here) would be classified as both short in duration and below average in magnitude."
Link: https://www.chartoftheday.com/ {Subscription may be required}.
*Currently long ETFs related to the Dow Jones Industrials in certain client accounts.

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

An-tSionna SPX 11.16.09


I was asked yesterday about the market on a longer term time period so here goes. First off let me apologize because this chart has an awful lot of information so it is perhaps too "busy" for some folks. I'll try to go through the most important points that I glean from this and I hope that makes this a bit clearer. You can double click on the chart to make it bigger.
I would also remind my readers that money flow analysis is taking a look at probabilities. We look at where the money wants to go and take a "Weight of the Evidence" approach as to what that is telling us. Since we are dealing with the future and the future is an unknowable event, then we have to be prepared to change our analysis as conditions change. In short-we try to deal with the world as it is, not as we wish it to be and then try to apply that world to our client's accounts.
The first thing I notice when I look at the market is that stocks in aggregate have filled their gap down from last fall. In fact if you would fold this chart over from the beginning of October, 2008 to the beginning of this October then you would have what looks like a typical bear market chart pattern. That of course is far from what occurred. My thesis is that the rally up to where we currently stand has to do with the Great Depression Part II being taken off the table. That is investors by and large now believe that a world wide financial collapse has been averted. If that's the case then investors can now focus on economic data. That data in the past few months has generally been better than expected, likely leading many investors to assume that the worst of the economic contraction is behind us. I could go into some of this data but it would make a long post longer. I'll try to do a piece at some point on the more positive data points we are currently seeing to add some heft to this point. For now you'll just have to take my word.
The next major thing I see is that the market is likely going to reach a resolution point in terms of its longer term character soon. That is that the market has stair stepped its way higher since March {heavy red line} and now for the first time in over a year is bumping up against major resistance levels that date back to this bear market's inception in late 2007 {heavy green lines} thus forming a triangle pattern that time says must soon be resolved. Probability indicates that a breakthrough of resistance should lead to a market that will at some point approach the 1200 level on the S&P 500 or 120 on the SPY {which is the chart pictured above}.
Probability also suggests that a market that ultimately fails to break through here could spend some time consolidating its gains or retest a level between 1060-1000 or 106-100 on the SPY. We will adjust the game plan accordingly to this sequence over time.
Shorter term of course the market has some very positive momentum going for it in terms of its end of year cyclical patterns. It is still somewhat overbought although that has worked itself off as the market trended sideways most of the Fall. Until this past week stocks spent most of the past two months going nowhere and it is beginning to look like our Autumn correction was one of time and not per se of price. We'll continue to monitor these patterns and update this sequence accordingly in the future.
*Long ETFs related to the S&P 500 in client and individual accounts. Long SPY in certain client accounts.
Intended solely as an illustration of money flow analysis. Not intended to be investment advice as we do not know casual reader's risk/reward parameters. If you are not a client of our firm please do your own homework regarding the markets or speak to your own investment advisor. Better yet you can hire us!

Market Timing II

When I started in this business all the wisdom said you could never time the market. That may have had some validity 20 some years ago (in the era of the dinosaurs as my kids say) but in an era of 1/8th to 1/4 point spreads on stocks and when buying or selling 100 shares of stock could cost close to 100 dollars in commissions. In today's world, particularly where money flows can be measured this is less and less true. Now I don't believe that one can ever precisely call a top or bottom in the markets. However, studying money flows can add the element of probability to trying to understand where we are in markets and then one can develop the appropriate tactics to that situation. The Wall Street Journal took on this subject almost as a rebuttal last Thursday. While the author seems to be saying that this might not work so well for mutual funds, note that this is not necessarily the conclusion of study out of New York University's Stern School of Business {mentioned Friday} on market timing. Here is the WSJ excerpted story with links. Highlights mine.
Mutual Funds Time the Market.
By Eleanor Laise.
In an effort to lure back investors still wary of stocks, more mutual-fund managers are playing a risky game: timing the market. Many of these funds promote their ability to avoid big losses by trading in and out of the stock market at just the right time. Some are labeled "tactical allocation" or "dynamic" funds. But even funds that don't openly tout such strategies are moving in and out of big cash stakes, betting that they can outsmart the volatile market.......
{Certain funds}......
have leeway to make swings between cash and other investments. But funds attempting to time the market often deliver erratic performance, charge high fees and rack up big trading costs. These funds are something of a bright spot for the fund industry, which has seen billions flow into bond funds but little cash go to more-profitable stock funds. Investors put $4.1 billion into world-allocation funds (Morningstar's category that tracks the most-flexible funds) in the first nine months of this year, while adding only $4.3 billion to stock funds and plowing $213 billion into taxable bond funds.
Some of these funds have beaten the market in recent years......But they can also give investors whiplash.....Fund companies say investors spooked by the recent market turmoil are demanding more-flexible products. Many investors have been frustrated "with investment products that were not able to react to the environment that we just went through," says Joel Sauber, head of U.S. products at Legg Mason......
A study from New York University's Stern School of Business suggests market-timing can work for some mutual-fund managers. The best stock-pickers during economic expansions also show some market-timing ability in recessions, the study found.
But academic research raises doubts that the typical fund manager can successfully time the market over the long haul.
Anders Ekholm, adjunct professor at Hanken School of Economics in Helsinki, recently analyzed more than 4,000 U.S. stock funds' returns between 2000 and 2007. Managers helped their performance through stock-picking, he found, but hurt their returns by market-timing.
There are a couple of reasons why the deck is stacked against market-timers, Mr. Ekholm says. Market-timing requires more trading, and transaction costs hurt performance. What's more, while a manager may relatively easily dig up some unique information that gives him an edge in selecting an individual stock, it's difficult to get such superior information about the overall market.
Though some fund companies are promoting their new tactical-allocation funds as core holdings, analysts are skeptical. If the manager makes a wrong call, like plowing into cash before a market rally, "that could really hurt the investor," says Karin Anderson, mutual-fund analyst at Morningstar.
Some managers moving in and out of the market rely on macroeconomic views. Others are simply bottom-up stock-pickers who hold lots of cash when they can't find other opportunities. Then there's John Hancock Technical Opportunities Fund, which is guided purely by technical analysis, examining patterns in market data.
Given these managers' long leash, it can be tough for investors to keep track of what they're doing...... Even some funds with narrower mandates are shifting in and out of big cash stakes.....Funds dodging in and out of the market also tend to be quite costly.
No postions in any funds mentioned.

Monday, November 16, 2009

Barrons: Why The Rally Can Continue.


Excerpted article in the Trader Section of Barrons from this past weekend. I've thrown in a new chart of the S&P for reference. It's not all that different from the chart I posted on Veteran's Day where we commented on the S&P's double top near 1100. Highlights are mine. Comment at the end.


"INERTIA IS A POWERFUL FORCE. FOLKS typically think of it as keeping an object at rest. But inertia also keeps the momentum behind something that's already moving -- as in the current stock market.
Buffeted last week by conflicting data about the strength of the U.S. economic rebound, stocks still managed to sustain their nice rally, albeit in unimpressive trading volumes.
On the week, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 2.5%, or 247 points, to 10,270.47, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index finished at 2167.88, up 2.6%. The Standard & Poor's 500 Index tacked on about 24, or 2.3%, to 10,93.48. For those looking for bad signs, the S&P, after several assaults, hasn't yet been able to crack the 1,100 threshold at the close. Higher-than-expected oil inventories led to the one bad day last Thursday, as investors momentarily fretted about the strength of the U.S. recovery.

But that wasn't enough to dent the rally. And it's not enough to change the sentiment and momentum. Some point to the recent outperformance of big-caps over small-caps as a negative -- but so far, that seems more a broadening of the rally than a weakness.
'Last week was a nice follow-through on the previous week's rally,' says Jack Ablin, chief investment officer at Harris Private Bank.
A body in motion tends to stay in motion, so until there are widespread data to cause investors to change their outlook, the market's inertia has support, he adds.
.....The good news, {Ablin} says, is that sanguine investors still have a pile of cash. Indeed,
market veterans find it hard to believe there's a bubble in the market when equity-mutual-fund flows remain in the red. The little guy isn't all-in yet.
Investors are rapidly getting comfortable with $75 to $80 in earnings per share for the S&P 500 index in 2010. Using a market price/earnings ratio of 15, lower than the current number, a rally past 1,100 by year's end isn't hard to imagine. For now, it doesn't matter whether that profit expectation turns out to be correct -- only that the market believes it.

EVEN NEOPHYTE INVESTORS KNOW THAT November kicks off a seven-month period which, historically, has been better for stocks than May-October. Atypically, however, this May-October period has been impressive, up nearly 20%. Consequently, one might be tempted to expect the rare November-April reversal.
But through Dec. 31, anyway, the rally should hold its own or even improve. Sentiment and momentum are likely too strong to be derailed by the odd negative economic figure......
Other historical data are supportive. According to Bespoke Investment Group, in nearly 90% of the years when the Dow Jones Industrial Average was up by at least 10% by October's end -- as is the case this year -- November and December managed a positive return, with the average gain of 4.2%. The S&P 500 is almost 20% above its moving average for the 10 months through October, another signal of good near-term returns almost 90% of the time.
Momentum supports the market and 'fundamental and technical factors are aligning at a seasonally strong time,' notes Richard Ross, the global technical strategist at brokerage Auerbach Grayson. "The cluster of evidence is in favor" of a good holiday season.
In early 2010, however, if there's a single number that could hurt this rally, it will be the fourth-quarter 2009 U.S. gross domestic product, due out Jan. 29. If not as good or better than expected, history and tradition could be trampled."

Link: {Subscription may be required}:
http://online.barrons.com/article/SB125815666383847643.html?mod=BOL_hps_mag

Comment: I think seasonal factors will hold through at least the end of the year. Not only have individuals been under invested in 2009 but so have many institutions. Mutual funds in particular have had higher than normal cash positions because as mentioned above the public has been a net seller of stocks so far this year. I've said for months that earnings estimates would likely have to be revised higher going into next year. Let's play with those numbers a bit. We'll use $77 dollars as a midpoint for S&P earnings going into 2010.

77 x 15 multiple = S&P 1,155 { 5.67% discount to Friday's S&P close}.
77 x 16 multiple = S&P 1,232 {12.71% discount to Friday's close}.
77 x 18 multiple = S&P 1,386 {26.80% discount to Friday's close}.

Now I'm not saying this is going to happen next year as events could conspire to change all of this at some point next year. The economy could weaken in the 2nd half of 2010 for instance. But given what we know at this point and given that the weight of the evidence increasingly seems to show that the economy is starting to bottom, a higher stock market by 2010's year end looks like a realistic scenario that we must incorporate into the playbook. How much higher is anybodies guess and much of that will depend on what happens between now and December 31, of this year.


*Long ETFs related to the Dow Jones Industrial Averages, S&P 500 & Nasdaq composite for client and personal accounts.

Sunday, November 15, 2009

an-tSionna Various Charts











For your weekend viewing. Notice how everyone of these ETF charts {S&P Spyder, Dow Jones Industrial Average, Gold ETF and Nasdaq 100} looks the same! I could print up a dozen more that look almost exactly like this but you get the idea. A rising tide lifts all boats and in this case all asset classes. The one exception is the US Dollar. I didn't include a chart of it but if you'd flip upside down any of these charts shown above you'd get an idea of what the dollar looks like.


*Long in client accounts and in personal accounts all of the ETFS mentioned above.

Saturday, November 14, 2009

DePauw vs. Wabash


On a happier college football note, my Alma Mater, DePauw University, plays arch rival Wabash College in the 115th showing of the Monon Bell Game {Notre Dame is a family thing which I've covered before and would take up too much time to explain right now-I'll do it at some later point}.



"The Monon (pronounced MOE-non) Bell football game is the annual contest between the DePauw University Tigers and the Wabash College Little Giants. The rivalry between DePauw and Wabash began in 1890 and more than 100 games have been played. The Monon Bell game was voted Indiana’s best football rivalry by ESPN fans.
The Monon Bell trophy, a 300-pound locomotive bell from the Monon Railroad, was introduced in 1932 at the suggestion of a DePauw alumnus, Orien Fifer '25, in a letter to the editor of The Indianapolis News. The Bell is awarded to the victorious team at the end of the game, to be held until contested again the following year. Since DePauw and Wabash are only 27 miles apart, the adversaries in the game are often brothers, cousins, high school classmates or good friends, adding to the competition’s intensity.
At the end of the 2008 season, the two teams have played for the Monon Bell 115 times, and the all time series between the Tigers and the Little Giants stands tied at 53-53-9.
The Monon Bell football game is more than just a rivalry. During the week of the game, both schools have numerous events and shared functions including concerts, debates and a blood drive. Learn more about the history and traditions of the Monon Bell by clicking
here."
Source: DePauw University. http://www.depauw.edu/visitors/traditions/mononbell.asp



We're gonna kick their "Danny" a***s this weekend! {We went 2-2 when I was in college. The game my Sr. year was interrupted by a dog running on the field. That's sports in Division 3!} -"Go Bragh!"

Notre Dame Vs. Pitt.

A broken & beleaguered Irish team heads to Pitt in a Saturday night televised national contest on ABC. I think the Irish are at a crossroads right now. Their once "easy" schedule hasn't proven to be any cakewalk and their coach's future is definitely on the line. The Irish could win out the rest of the way or lose all three remaining games, it's that close IMHOP. I think Weis has to win 2 of his last 3 to keep his job. I think he will only be allowed to lose close to Pitt.....
Unfortunately I think that's what happens. I think the Irish make a game of it but come up losers. Hope I'm wrong.

Friday, November 13, 2009

Market Timing

The Big Picture takes note yesterday of a study out of New York University's Stern School of Business on Market Timing. To wit:
"Here’s something that oughta give the marketing wizards at traditional Wall Street firms a heart attack: Timing beats buy and hold, according to a study by finance professors at the New York University Stern School of Business.
I doubt its pure timing — my best guess is, the fund managers involved more likely used aggressive risk management tools and capital preservation strategies. To the unknowing, these look like timing but are not.
The profs found that fund managers who invest based on macroeconomic trends — and are willing to adjust their portfolios as those trends change — are the managers most likely to add value for investors.
How you define “macroeconomic trend changes” and the basis of portfolio adjustments is a key factor — one that is not delineated all that clearly:
“By analyzing data from January 1980 through December 2005, the study identified the top 25% of actively managed equity mutual funds based on their ability to select stocks during expansionary economic periods. The report noted that this same group showed proficiency at market timing during recessions as well.
This group outperformed other funds in both risk-adjusted terms and after expenses, according to the study.”
Cash has beaten stocks for the past 10 years; Even worse, Bonds have beaten Stocks since 1966.
To me, this suggests that an active asset allocation program (rather than pure market timing) is the way to go for most high net worth investors.
Despite the weak stock performance, expect massive pushback on this from the long-only, fully-invested, fee-based actors on the street.
Already, we see critiques from Morningstar. Russel Kinnel, the director of mutual fund research, carped that 'the 1980s were littered with funds that blew up because managers tried to follow macroeconomic trends.'
The Street will {fight} this line of thought tooth and nail, but given the horrific performance if the LOFIFB firms, they have their work cut out for them . . .

Seasonal Patterns. Cramer's Take.

Jim Cramer of CNBC's mad money and The Street.com wrote an interesting piece yesterday on seasonal cyclicality in the markets. This is a very well known pattern where stocks have traditionally performed better in the last two months of the year and traditionally perform better in the late October early April time frame than over the summer months. It should be noted that this pattern has broken down somewhat over the past three years. Fall of 2007 was a very bad period for equities and stocks have been strong all through the summer months of this year. However, in a bullish phase like we've seen so far since March we should not underestimate Wall Street's desire to get paid in the form of performance bonuses. That's why many argue that stocks will do well through at least year end. Below is an excerpt of Cramer's take on this. Link @ the end. Highlights are mine.
"All morning {yesterday} I have listened to extended discussions about why the futures are down.....{Cramer} think{s} it is nonsense.There's no reason for the futures to be doing anything. We are, once again, presuming knowledge.
What's really going on? H-P paid a huge amount of money for 3Com...which is bullish..... And, like Macy's....Wal-Mart's keeping things nice and conservative for the holidays.There really isn't much more to it.
We have seen an important pattern ever since we got down to about 60 trading days in the year. There are now just 33. Every kind of 0.5% or 1% decrease has brought in buyers until we get so overbought.....that we get 2% to 3% declines.......But I am also conscious that there is so little time left in the year that you might not even get that."
Link: http://www.thestreet.com/p/_tsc/rmoney/jimcramerblog/10625680.html
*I do not own any of the stocks mentioned above personally or for client accounts but they are all likely elements in many of the different ETFs I own personally and for client accounts.

Thursday, November 12, 2009

an-tSionna: SPX 11.11.09


Update on the S&P 500. You can double click on the chart to make it larger.
*Long ETFs related to the S&P 500 in client and personal accounts.

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

an-tSionna: Gold


I was asked the other day by one of the Boston Boys about Gold. Since it seems like everybody is talking about it these days, I thought I'd share with you what I'm seeing in terms of managing this position.
Please note that I am long the gold ETF GLD in various client accounts. However, this should not be construed as a recommendation to currently buy or sell this or any ETF related to gold. This is simply to give you an idea of how I am managing the position that I hold from the standpoint of charting money flows into this ETF. Money flow analysis is only one of the data points we use in studying our each of our securities and it cannot be viewed in a vacuum. Any buy or sell decisions that I make regarding all of our levels of only come after considering the risk/reward mandates of each of our individual clients. If you are not a client of our firm then you need to consult your own investment advisor or do some research on your own. OR YOU CAN HIRE US!! :-)
*Long GLD in certain client accounts.

Veteran's Day

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

An tSionna: Warren Buffett


Just a little over a year ago Warren Buffett in a now famous New York Times Op-Ed piece indicated that he thought stocks were cheap and that he for the first time in a very long period was a personal buyer of US equities. The title of the article was "Buy America. I Am". Here is a link to the original article: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/17/opinion/17buffett.html?_r=2&scp=2&sq=warren%20buffett&st=cse&oref=slogin.

We discussed this editorial a few days later. We said at the time we would come back periodically to see how Warren had done.
http://lumencapital.blogspot.com/2008/10/buffetts-new-york-times-editorial.html Time has a way of getting away from us and we did not write much about Buffett's bet over the past year although we never forgot the editorial. Buffett's purchase of Burlington Northern Railroad {BNI} last week reminded us to go back and see how Warren had done over the past year. For reasons we explained then we used an average price of 928 over a two day period as a price basis to grade Warren.
The first thing we'd note is that Buffett, who has never characterized himself as a short term investor, certainly did not buy at the bottom. We say this not knowing if he continued to buy into his original stake but base this claim only when we know he said he was buying stocks. At one point in the Spring Buffett was down over 25% on his investment.
Yet we know that Buffett was and continues to be bullish on the economy and hence on stocks. His purchase of BNI illustrates that. The S&P 500 closed yesterday @ 1093.08. That puts Buffett up about 18% since then, not including dividends. Buffett took a lot of flack from the pundits when he penned that article. As of now however it looks to us like he's getting the last laugh. We'll check in on Warren again in maybe about a year. We think he'll still be making money on his October 2008 purchases.
*Long ETFS related to the S&P 500 in client and personal accounts. BNI may be a component of several different ETFs we own for personal & client accounts but we do not own any of the shares in any account.

Sunday, November 08, 2009

Oh Gaaak! Navy Beats ND

Navy raced out to a 14-0 halftime lead against an unprepared and utterly befuddled Notre Dame team on Saturday, then relied on a strong red zone defense to thwart an Irish comeback. The 23-21 upset win is the second for the Midshipmen in the last three years after 43 consecutive losses to Notre Dame, and may become too great a burden for Coach Charlie Weis to survive.


For the record I've been at both of these losses. Just atrocious.

Friday, November 06, 2009

Out Till Tuesday. Irish Vs. Navy


Out till Tuesday. The eldest employee of Lumen Capital (That's her on the left) is off to look @ Notre Dame & St. Mary's Colleges this weekend. She and I will attend the football game on Saturday. I have a gaggle of meetings on Monday so will have no time to put something up.
Speaking of the game. I think the Irish win late with some heroics by the offense to pull the game out in the final seconds. That just seems to be this team's M.O.
Back to fight the good battles at the beginning of the week.

Thursday, November 05, 2009

WSJ: The Cruel Math Of Big Losses.

Excellent Wall Street Journal Article on the math behind large losses. In a year like last year losses were unavoidable if you were in anything other than US Treasuries and cash. However, the article talks about the hill investors must climb to recover from that sort of bear market. This is a very long article and parts of it are more germain to mutual fund investors it seems. I've excerpted what I think are the important take aways and added my own highlights in green. A link is at the end.
This year's robust stock-market advance has done a lot to bolster investors' psyches. Too bad many people's portfolios still haven't recovered from last year......in most cases those returns haven't brought people's stock-fund holdings back to their values at the start of 2008, let alone their higher values at the stock-market peak, in October 2007.
The culprit is what money manager and newsletter editor Daniel Wiener calls "the tyranny of the mathematics of loss": When you suffer a very large loss, you need a gigantic gain to get back to where you started.
If an investment declines 10%, it takes about an 11% gain to break even (assuming you don't pump in additional dollars). If the drop is 20%, you need a 25% gain to recover. A fall of one-third requires a rebound of 50%. And if your investment falls by half, "you need a double," or a 100% return, says Mr. Wiener, the New York-based editor of the Independent Adviser for Vanguard Investors. The recovery percentages grow exponentially because you have so few dollars working for you after a big loss.
Last year, the average diversified U.S.-stock fund was down 37.5%—requiring a 60% advance to break even—and plenty of funds were down 50% or more. Investors looking at this year's performance listings should know that some big gainers are volatile funds that were big losers last year; thus, investors' holdings may still be worth far less than they were in late 2007.
Many funds have posted eye-catching returns so far this year, but investors' nest eggs may not have much to show for it.
Goal Reminder
It's impossible to avoid losing some money when you are an investor. But the harsh math of 2008 and 2009 is a reminder of a key goal that most investors should strive for: avoiding the largest losses. Many investors trimmed their overall losses last year by holding bond funds and other investments along with stock funds. .......
"A manager who limited losses last year goes a huge way to helping investors accumulate wealth over time and meet their long-term goals," says Don Phillips, a managing director at research firm Morningstar Inc. "It's the kind of victory that often goes unnoticed" amid the gloom of losing money, he adds......
Ms. Damato is a news editor for The Wall Street Journal, based in South Brunswick

Wednesday, November 04, 2009

Personal Savings Numbers Part II

From 24/7 Wall Street last week.
Personal Income & Spending Dispel Inflation Fears
Posted: October 30, 2009 at 8:41 am
The consumer is still strapped. The Commerce Department posted its data for September’s personal income and spending, and frankly it almost makes you question yesterday’s GDP data. The report showed that Personal Income was unchanged in September, but showed that Spending was down by -0.5%. Dow Jones and other consensus data were looking for figures to be largely unchanged. The drop in spending appears to the worst reading this year, but there is a silver lining… with no income rise there is that much less fear of a heating inflation tea kettle.One issue to consider here is that August spending was revised higher to 1.4% from 1.3%. And August income was revised to 0.1% from 0.2%. One positive items for tomorrow rather than today is that savings rose to 3.3% of disposable income from 2.8% in August. As one in ten are out of work and other 6 or 8 in 10 are underemployed, it seems as though very little in this report could be deemed as heating up or very inflationary.
There is nothing hot about these numbers. And it might make some question just how high that Q3
GDP report came out yesterday, assuming you try to compare oranges to tangerines.
JON C. OGG

Link:
http://247wallst.com/2009/10/30/personal-income-spending-dispel-inflation-fears/#more-51782