WSJ: The Cruel Math Of Big Losses.
The culprit is what money manager and newsletter editor Daniel Wiener calls "the tyranny of the mathematics of loss": When you suffer a very large loss, you need a gigantic gain to get back to where you started.
If an investment declines 10%, it takes about an 11% gain to break even (assuming you don't pump in additional dollars). If the drop is 20%, you need a 25% gain to recover. A fall of one-third requires a rebound of 50%. And if your investment falls by half, "you need a double," or a 100% return, says Mr. Wiener, the New York-based editor of the Independent Adviser for Vanguard Investors. The recovery percentages grow exponentially because you have so few dollars working for you after a big loss.
Last year, the average diversified U.S.-stock fund was down 37.5%—requiring a 60% advance to break even—and plenty of funds were down 50% or more. Investors looking at this year's performance listings should know that some big gainers are volatile funds that were big losers last year; thus, investors' holdings may still be worth far less than they were in late 2007.
Many funds have posted eye-catching returns so far this year, but investors' nest eggs may not have much to show for it.
Goal Reminder
It's impossible to avoid losing some money when you are an investor. But the harsh math of 2008 and 2009 is a reminder of a key goal that most investors should strive for: avoiding the largest losses. Many investors trimmed their overall losses last year by holding bond funds and other investments along with stock funds. .......
Ms. Damato is a news editor for The Wall Street Journal, based in South Brunswick
<< Home