Wednesday, December 19, 2018

Where Could 2019 Take Us? (December Letter)


By Christopher R. English, President of Lumen Capital Management, LLC


The year is quickly coming to a close, and with that, it’s an ideal time to look ahead and prepare ourselves for a new year. Part of that preparation includes looking at our economy and markets overall to see what factors could affect our portfolios as we usher in 2019. Back in October, we saw market corrections at their finest, with stocks dropping 12% from their highs. While there have been losses and gains of around 8% since then, current stock prices are not that far off from where they were just a couple of months ago. 

Market declines and volatility usually arrive when investors view the future with uncertainty, and right now, there are three main issues that affect investors: fear of a slowing economy, rising interest rates, and uncertainty about trade policy. Let’s take a look at each one and see how they could impact your finances.

A Slowing Economy

A major concern is that slowing economic growth will lead to a recession in 2019 or 2020. So far, the economic data does give evidence of that happening. Currently, we are experiencing record corporate profit margins, record employment, and over 1 million job openings. While it’s true that many economists expect growth to slow from this year’s nearly 3% pace, these examples of growth {and others I could list if the space permitted} are simply not conducive to a recession being just around the corner. I believe this concern is overblown unless we start to see evidence of a recession in other sectors of our economy.

Higher Interest Rates

Last month, I explained that cash and fixed-income investments are now providing an alternative to stocks. This is partially a response to the Federal Reserve ending its easy money policies of the past decade as well as raising interest rates throughout this past year. There have been signs from the Federal Reserve that a more neutral policy would be adopted for 2019, which could provide a bit of a cushion for stocks next year. Even if rates increase a bit more, I can remember when fixed-income investments routinely yielded between 3-6% and stocks managed to post gains. Of course, we have exposure to dividend growth via our total return ETF strategies. Rising interest rates have not helped this group of investments this year but their recent declines are, on average, not as severe as other parts of the market and, when adjusting for dividends, have provided nice ballast in rough seas.

Trade Policy


The factor that seems to be affecting the markets the most is tensions with China. If we look at market patterns, we see that stocks seem to rise and fall depending on investor’s perception of developments out of Asia and our trade concerns. 

I believe there are two issues regarding China. The longer-term problem is an increasing view of China as our rival in the geopolitical sphere. The more immediate issue revolves around trade. I believe that at some point we will make a deal with the Chinese because it is in their interests and ours to come to the table and resolve some of the immediate problems. Unfortunately, this issue will probably not be resolved by the end of 2018. As such, any rally between now and the end of the year will likely depend on the headlines while the volatility associated with the past four months is unlikely to subside until a trade deal is announced.

A Discussion On Volatility


President Trump’s legal issues could also be thrown into the mix of what’s causing market volatility, but the three factors listed above seem to be the immediate concern for investors. I believe that the market has spent this year digesting the gains of the past few years. We’ve seen this pattern of gain followed by consolidation repeatedly since 2009. Markets peaked back in January of this year and have spent months carving out a trading range of roughly 300 points on the S&P 500. Right now, we are trading near the lows of that range. The average stock is down nearly 7% for the year and 12-15% off their most recent highs. However, markets are still 40% higher than their February 2016 lows, not including dividends. By looking at market trends, we can see that, in this particular bull market, periods of consolidation have always led to higher volatility.

Simply put, volatility is the price investors pay for liquidity. It is the market’s reset mechanism. Investors should expect some volatility and should accept that sometimes prices will correct. Equities are never a one-way ticket higher. This current correction is about average in terms of its decline and duration. It may feel extreme due to how much prices have declined in a short period of time. It also feels worse compared to 2017, when we saw some of the lowest volatility ever recorded for stocks. 

Volatility, while most often associated with declines, can work both ways. But you don’t often hear investors complaining when they see sharp gains in their investments. Investors mostly dislike volatility as prices head lower, especially when the declines are swift and steep like they are right now. 

We have strategies in our playbook that deal with trendless and more volatile periods and we use them in our game plan for client accounts. One of the easiest methods is to have some cash on hand. Since it is unlikely that your portfolios will ever be 100% in cash when invested with us, this will never provide complete protection against declines. Put it this way, if Warren Buffett knows of no way to completely hedge a portfolio against risk, then it is probably impossible to do so. The goal when investing is to be aware when the markets are in a lower probability environment and have enough cash that fits into your risk/reward parameters. Hopefully, you will be able to deploy that cash when markets begin their next advance.

In a period like this, investors must recognize how things have changed and then adapt that change to their portfolios. I have been using this period similarly to other phases where we’ve been trendless to reassess and reorganize client accounts where needed. If evidence indicates the economy is slowing, I could potentially raise cash on rallies to higher prices. Also, as we have indicated before, there are events that might force us to become more defensive, especially if we believe the market was resolving this corrective phase to a lower level of trading. 

ETFs And Dividends


However, I have been more interested in trying to find investments via our ETF process where we can find value. In the short-term, this may not play out, but I believe there is value being created in this current decline as long as the economy continues to grow. I am always attracted to ETFs when the current market dislocation has brought the fund down to levels where the dividend is attractive. Many ETFs that specialize in paying dividends are now trading at levels where the dividends are paying 3.5-4%. That should provide a cushion in case of further market declines.

I also want to reiterate why I believe dividends are so important. They are the silent workers in a portfolio. They don’t directly add to value each day like price movement and when they show up in a portfolio they generally arrive with little fanfare, but over time, their contributions add up. Here’s an example: There is a dividend paying ETF that first arrived in the markets in 2003. It started trading at $50 and went below $26 in 2009. Since then, it has appreciated along with the markets and now trades around $94.50. It has paid its dividend every quarter since inception, although the dividend did decline after the 2008-2009 bear market. If you had bought that security at its original price, it would have paid you over $33 in dividends per share since then, with the quarterly dividend increasing nearly 200% since its initial payment. This particular ETF’s dividend should increase over the years as the economy grows. Right now, it is on track for an estimated 12% dividend growth in 2018. Growth like this may be boring to some, but our opinion is that boring works in the long run. Dividends like this can also provide some support in market declines. Markets will rise and fall in value but the cash earned from dividends is yours to keep. (1)

While there are enormous advantages to ETFs, especially during volatile times, they are not immune from market declines. If their underlying index declines, then they will also lose value by something that mirrors the decline in the underlying index. They are also not a panacea for volatility. Recent events have shown they can be whipsawed around like any common stock. However, we can invest knowing we own a diversified portfolio of assets, backed by the value of the securities in an underlying index while removing single stock risk from the portfolio. 

The history of equities tells us they can be wracked by fraud, can trade to zero due to a catastrophic loss, or be rendered obsolete by unforeseen technological change. It is an extremely low probability event that a plain vanilla ETF, especially one with a long trading history and based on a well-established index, will suffer such a catastrophic event causing it to lose all value. We say this is a low probability event because nearly 33 years of investing tells us there are no guarantees. However, the inherent value of the underlying assets and the unique creation and redemption process of ETFs make this unlikely. Frankly, probability suggests the only events that would cause the inherent value of a majority of ETFs to trade to zero would be ones where we think most of us would have more things on our minds than the value of our investment portfolios. Because the underlying assets supporting ETFs have value, we can use our systematic approach to creating portfolios and strategies from this asset class.

What About The S&P 500?

Right now the S&P 500 trades with a PE ratio of around 15, a dividend yield of 1.85%, and an earnings yield of roughly 6.6% based on the next four quarter’s estimates. These levels suggest that the market is, at most, valued fairly. If earnings hold up in 2019, then the argument can be made that stocks are now somewhat undervalued. Preliminarily looking out into 2019, I can make the case for an S&P 500 that would have the potential to trade 10-15% higher from current levels, assuming we see no further evidence of economic deterioration. That makes the risk/reward equation more favorable at this point. However, it would not surprise me if stocks wait until later in 2019, potentially in the 2nd half of the year, before they begin their next period of advance while volatility may remain elevated during that time. We will discuss this more in our winter letter. Two things that could derail this view is the possibility that we do not resolve our trade differences with China and President Trump’s political problems spilling into the economic sphere.

Happy Holidays From Lumen Capital Management


Finally, it is my fondest wish for you to have a most joyous holiday season as well as a prosperous and healthy 2019. I am honored to serve you every day and I thank each and every one of you for your continued trust and support. I also look forward to catching up early in 2019. I leave you with comments from Warren Buffett about stocks and volatility since they are as relevant today as when they were first uttered.

“The unconventional, but inescapable, conclusion to be drawn from the past fifty years is that it has been far safer to invest in a diversified collection of American businesses than to invest in securities — Treasuries, for example — whose values have been tied to American currency. That was also true in the preceding half-century, a period including the Great Depression and two world wars. Investors should heed this history. To one degree or another it is almost certain to be repeated during the next century.

Stock prices will always be far more volatile than cash-equivalent holdings. Over the long term, however, currency-denominated instruments are riskier investments — far riskier investments — than widely-diversified stock portfolios that are bought over time and that are owned in a manner invoking only token fees and commissions. That lesson has not customarily been taught in business schools, where volatility is almost universally used as a proxy for risk. Though this pedagogic assumption makes for easy teaching, it is dead wrong: Volatility is far from synonymous with risk. Popular formulas that equate the two terms lead students, investors and CEOs astray.” (2)

Please contact me if you want to discuss this or anything else. Call my office at 312.953.8825 or email us at lumencapital@hotmail.com

About Chris

Christopher R. English is the President and founder of Lumen Capital Management, LLC-a Registered Investment Advisor regulated by the State of Illinois. A copy of our ADV Part II is available upon request. We manage portfolios for investors, developing customized portfolios that reflect a client’s unique risk/reward parameters. We also manage a private partnership currently closed to outside investors. Mr. English has over three decades of experience working with individuals, families, businesses, and foundations. Based in the greater Chicago area, he serves clients throughout Illinois, as well as Florida, Massachusetts, California, Indiana, and other states. To schedule a complimentary portfolio review, contact Chris today by calling 312.953.8825 or emailing him at lumencapital@hotmail.com. The information contained here is taken from sources deemed reliable but cannot be guaranteed. Mr. English may, from time to time, write about stocks or other assets in which he or other family members has an investment. In such cases appropriate disclosure is made. Lumen Capital Management, LLC provides investment advice or recommendations only for its clients. As such the information contained herein is designed solely for the clients or contacts of Lumen Capital Management, LLC and is not meant to be considered general investment advice
___________

(1) I have not named the ETF mentioned above so as to not be seen as making a recommendation. Feel free to call if you want to discuss this ETF and how it fits into our portfolio strategies. Its information regarding historical dividends and prices comes from sources deemed to be reliable but cannot be guaranteed. We will happily provide the historical information on its dividend and price history upon request. Also, as a disclosure, most clients’ and my personal accounts own this security.


Monday, December 17, 2018

Chart Talk


Here's a chart of the S&P 500's ETF {SPY}.  What I've shown in highlights above is how it's traded over approximately the last year.  You can see that it has carved out a trading range of 260 on the low side and 285 near its top.  Right now we are trading near the low end of this range, although not appreciably lower than where we were a month ago.  Also these same levels were tested in February and April.  Investors will anxiously watch whether the lower part of this range will hold this week.   We are becoming more oversold and if there is going to be a Santa Claus rally it should begin this week.  However, I must warn you that the market is a slave to headlines right now.  In particular, it is anxious about progress on a trade deal with the Chinese.  These headlines oscillate between positive and negative while the President can't seem to ever put his Twitter account away.  As such, it is very hard to predict how the trading action might progress as we close out the year.

Most of Wall Street has seen a miserable 2018 and trading desks will start to shut down for the holidays after next week so the action could see the rise of further volatility in the meantime.

Back Wednesday.

The chart above is from Tradingview.com although the annotations are mine.  You can make it larger by double-clicking on it.

*Long ETFs related to the S&P 500 in client and personal accounts.  Please note positions can change at any time    We reserve the right to change these investments without notice on this blog or via any other form of verbal, written or electronic communication. 

Thursday, December 13, 2018

Fighting The Last War

I have a crazy schedule today but wanted to add one quick thought.  I believe the underlying anxiety , the ghost down the hall so to speak, is to avoid a repeat of the last two great bear markets.  Everybody is constantly on the look out for, and proclaiming about how we're on the verge of the next "big one".  Today I'll simply leave you with some bullet points to ponder. At some point I'm going to discuss this in a bit more detail.

Just as we hear echos from the Great Depression when talking to people who lived through the 1930s, the scars from the 2007-2011 recession {or depression depending on your viewpoint} are generational and will have a lasting impact for many years.

For investors this means trying to identify the events that would morph a run of the mill correction into a historic bear market.

For this to occur you need (a.) an unexpected event of significant magnitude or (b.)a large scale and largely unlooked for or poorly understood financial bubble whose deflation impacts a significant percentage of the population or causes significant damage to the financial sector.

(a.) above is something you can not prepare for.  It will either occur or it will not.  As to (b.) there is simply no evidence that I can see that something like that exists out there right now.  While there is the possibility I have erred in this assessment, data so far is not indicating that such an event is in the offing and therefore based on what we know today, we would consider this a low probability event.

Investors of all stripes who have either called for a reoccurrence of the last bear market have simply been wrong in their assumptions and have cost both themselves and others the opportunities this current bull market has afforded.

We will have corrections and ultimately at some point another full fledged bear market.  But the kind of correction we have seen so far in 2017 is a normal part of investing.  Ultimately it is healthy as it allows stocks to reset for a possible move higher over the next 12-18 months as long as the economy remains healthy.

Back early next week.


Tuesday, December 11, 2018

Disclosure

While I have only been talking about the country of China in my two most recent posts and not China per sae as an investment, I think I should still probably also disclose that I am long investing in China via certain ETFs in client and personal accounts.  Also clients and my personal accounts will have exposure to China via certain international ETFs that we own.

Again, not sure I actually need this disclosure given what's been discussed but I will put it out there anyway in an effort to be as transparent as possible.

And Again China

So right now you know I think it's China that wags the market dog's tail.  On cue futures are up on news of talks commencing between the US and China today amid a more positive vibe out of the two countries on the basis for formulating a deal.   Of course given the most recent trading history we could be down 500 points by the end of the day.  Hard to make any sense out of these opens.  Buyers are on strike, spooked by all the volatility and most of the day belongs to the program traders.  

However, if we can get some stability on the China front then there is a higher probability that we see some sort of rally into January.  Most years I would give you an 80-85% chance that we'd be up higher by the December 31 close but this isn't most years.  Right now I'd peg odds of a rally only between 60-70%.  That's assuming we don't see negative developments on the trade front.  Oh, and it would be nice if the President would lay off of his twitter feed for a bit as well.   If there was ever a stage and a time for stocks to put in some sort of meaningful bounce it would seem to be now as we are again oversold enough for us to rally.  I still think we could potentially see a 4-5% rally between now and year-end.  However, I also think that potential for higher prices {or not}  will largely be based now on news events and not market fundamentals.

Back Thursday.

Monday, December 10, 2018

China

I listed on Thursday the main issues I believed have been spooking the markets.  What I believe right now is bothering stocks the most is our seemingly increasing trade tensions with China.  The news of the arrest this weekend of of the CFO of Chinese company Huawei Technologies at the request of the United States on charges seemingly related to illegal exports to Iran cannot be seen as a positive development and we will have to see how it plays out this week and whether it has the capacity to derail current trade negotiations.  Regarding China I believe there are two issues weighing on markets.  The first regards the more immediate issue of resolving our basic trade differences. The longer term problem is an increasing view of China as a rival in the geopolitical sphere.  I hope to return to my longer-term views on China, its opportunities and risks at some point early in 2018.  

The more immediate issue with China revolves around trade.  Here I am of the belief that at some point we will get a deal with the Chinese because it is in their interests as well as ours to come to the table and resolve some of our immediate issues on trade.  I do not expect this issue will be resolved before the end of the year.  As such, while I think that stocks have the ability to tack on 4-5% by the end of 2018. This will likely depend more on headline risk on this trade front and the volatility associated with the past four months is unlikely to subside until such a deal is announced.  

Again I will have more to say about China at a future date.

Friday, December 07, 2018

Still At Sea




USS Arizona {BB-39} departed Naval Station Pearl Harbor 0806 hours Hawaii time December 7, 1941. Sill listed at sea by the United States Navy.

Thursday, December 06, 2018

Warren Buffett On Volatility


Market sell-offs such as this generate a lot of fear.  Wall Street uses the term volatility to specifically mean a decline in stock prices.  Volatility works both ways but presumably investors for the most part don't mind when stock prices spike higher.  It's the concept of losing money in a short period of time that most investors dislike.  Warren Buffett has over the years opined on volatility and market declines.  I thought I'd share these for your consideration. 

“The unconventional, but inescapable, conclusion to be drawn from the past fifty years is that it has been far safer to invest in a diversified collection of American businesses than to invest in securities — Treasuries, for example — whose values have been tied to American currency. That was also true in the preceding half-century, a period including the Great Depression and two world wars. Investors should heed this history. To one degree or another it is almost certain to be repeated during the next century.

Stock prices will always be far more volatile than cash-equivalent holdings. Over the long term, however, currency-denominated instruments are riskier investments — far riskier investments — than widely-diversified stock portfolios that are bought over time and that are owned in a manner invoking only token fees and commissions. That lesson has not customarily been taught in business schools, where volatility is almost universally used as a proxy for risk. Though this pedagogic assumption makes for easy teaching, it is dead wrong: Volatility is farfrom synonymous with risk.Popular formulas that equate the two terms lead students, investors and CEOs astray.”

http://www.businessinsider.com/warren-buffett-on-risk-and-volatility-2015-4

What's Spooking The Markets.

Ok so here's all the issues spooking the markets and why we've dropped nearly 6% in the S&P 500 in the past two trading sessions.

1.  Over bought after all the giddiness from Federal Reserve Chairman Jay Powell's more dovish comments regarding a possible softening stance on interest rates last week and the 90-day freeze on tariff implementation coming out of the G-20 meeting between China and the US.

2.  Continued decline in the price of oil.

3.  Inversion of certain parts of the yield curve.  {Not enough time to go into this in detail.  Just know that some investors believe this can be a harbinger of a recession or at least an economic slowdown.}

4.  Fears of a slowing US economy.  {Note that a slowing economy doesn't necessarily mean a recession.}

5.  Fears that there was less than meets the eye out of the supposed positive outcome between Presidents Trump and Xi Jinping at the G-20 meeting.  

6.  Algorithmic trading run amok. {Again a topic for another time.}

All of these events have led more to a buyers strike than out and out selling by most investors.  Any  of these reasons, or just a few of them, might have been enough to bring back volatility to stocks.

Next week we'll begin our long promised series on what we think this means going forward.  Here's a hint.  Right now the evidence is not indicative of a recession next year and stocks may be cheap based on what we know today and looking out 12-18 months.  The one wild card to that scenario is China which we'll also discuss in the future as well.

Back early next week.

*Long ETFs related to the S&P 500 and many of the countries listed above via regional or international funds in client and personal accounts.  Please note positions can change at any time    We reserve the right to change these investments without notice on this blog or via any other form of verbal, written or electronic communication. 

Wednesday, December 05, 2018

On President Bush

The markets are closed today as the nation mourns George HW Bush.  Much has been said about the President as a man and there's no sense in repeating all of that.  However, it is hard not to notice the genuine outpouring of sadness that seems to have enveloped the American people on his passing.  This is perhaps more acute amongst those of us old enough to remember those years.  President Bush was the last President of the World War II generation and also the last President to have seen active duty and combat.*  

The passing of President Bush and ultimately when he passes President Carter will truly mark the passing of that generation and it seems that our politics is much smaller and the worse for it as they leave the stage.  We will be back talking about the markets tomorrow.  Today we'll celebrate the life of this remarkable individual.

God bless sir.

*Jimmy Carter is also a military veteran, having graduated the Naval Academy in 1946 and ultimately was an Executive Officer on a submarine but he didn't as far as I know every see combat and graduated too late from the Academy to serve in World War II.

Monday, December 03, 2018

George H.W. Bush


Sometimes we need to note things beyond the ups and downs of the investment world.  The passing of George Bush marks such an event as he represented many of the best qualities of his generation.  He has always reminded me very much of the Patrician.  God Bless and God Speed sir.  Your service to your country has ended.  Rest in Peace and I hope the reunion with your parents, Barbara and Robin was as joyous as you imagined it would be.