Bank of America Round One.
It started last week when WSJ reported that Lewis, under oath, said he was forced into making the Merrill acquisition. Now, Thain has fired back at BofA, saying the bank lied about its role in the huge bonuses and losses at Merrill.
Lewis’ comments see to be “utter and shameless nonsense, an attempt to worm out of responsibility,” FusionIQ CEO Barry Ritholtz writes on his blog, noting Lewis is only making excuses for a terrible acquisition. “Its the sort of weasely responsibility evading CEO speak we have come to expect these days.”
But just because Lewis’ comments might be outlandish doesn’t mean Thain’s a saint either. Quite the contrary, in fact, as his latest comments suggest he’s taking an immature path to defending himself.
Thain’s bad-mouthing of his former employer shows he’s making “the basic mistake of a snippy college kid” who got fired from his first job, Scott Reeves writesat Minyanville.
“Thain plays into the populist disdain by saying, in effect, ‘I didn’t do it, so don’t blame me,’” Reeves says.
Instead, Thain shouldn’t have commented at all on BofA. “If Thain is more or less right, the facts will speak for themselves and those who care about the issue will figure it out,” Reeves notes.
It’ll be interesting to see how all this plays out, but in the meantime, Ritholtz says this is all starting to look like a variation of the prisoners dilemma.
“Both parties would probably be better off if everyone kept quiet, but each individual party is better off confessing than remaining silent,” he says. “And both of these guys cannot be telling the truth.' ”
<< Home