Myths Of Stocks During the Depression

I think that strictly speaking the 1930's still looms as the worst 10 year period for stock performance-although at this point this decade may be close. Barrons last week printed an article dealing with stocks during the depression. Excerpt below with link @ the end.

Dispelling Myths About Stocks in the 1930s
By MARK HULBERT

MUST WE LOOK BACK TO THE Great Depression to really understand the current stock market?....It is testament to the severity of this bear market that the consensus opinion has shifted so much that it is now respectable to look to the 1930s for guidance about what is in store for equities.
I'm skeptical, however.....My skepticism instead traces to the small number of analysts and commentators who have really analyzed what an analogy to the 1930s truly entails. And if we are to genuinely learn the lessons of history, we have no choice but to start with an accurate assessment of what actually happened.....Here are some myths about the Depression that should be dispelled.

MYTH 1: It took 25 years for the stock market to recover its losses from the high reached just before the stock market crashed in October 1929.
It's easy to see why investors believe this myth to be true: It wasn't until Nov. 23, 1954, that the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed above the level at which it closed on Sept. 3, 1929, the date of its closing high before that year's crash. That's a recovery period of more than 25 years.....The truth, however, is that it took stocks far less than 25 years to recover. According to Wharton finance professor Jeremy Siegel, the inflation-adjusted total return index of the U.S. stock market was just as high in late 1936 and early 1937 as it was at its precrash peak in 1929. That was less than eight years later....
WHY THE BIG DIFFERENCE?
One factor is dividends, which were substantial during the 1930s. At the depths of the Great Depression, in fact, the Dow's dividend yield was in the double digits. Ignoring dividends, which is what investors do when focusing on price alone, therefore, introduces a significant pessimistic bias into any historical analysis.
ANOTHER FACTOR IS DEFLATION: The consumer price index actually dropped by 27% between its 1929 peak and its low in 1933. A stock that dropped by less than this amount in nominal terms over this four-year period, therefore, actually turned a profit in inflation-adjusted terms.
Yet another reason why it took the Dow so long to surmount its 1929 peak: The decision in 1939 to delete International Business Machines from the average. It wasn't added back until years later. According to Norman Fosback, editor of Fosback's Fund Forecaster, the Dow would today be more than twice its quoted level had IBM not been removed from the average in 1939.

MYTH 2: If we're playing out a 1930s script, now would be a bad time for long-term investors to get into the stock market.
Actually, if the stock market were to exactly adhere to a 1930s-like script, equities would provide a handsome return over the next five years.
Once again, this insight relies on data from Professor Siegel. To locate the date during the 1930s that is most analogous to today, he looked for the point at which the stock market after 1929 had -- as is the case today -- declined by around half on a dividend-adjusted and an inflation-adjusted basis. That point came at the end of 1930, just 16 months after the August 1929 stock-market top. (Ironically, of course, the current bear market is just 16 months old too.)
According to Siegel, over the five-year period beginning in January 1931, the stock market produced an inflation-adjusted total return of 7%. That's right in line with stocks' long-term average performance, in fact.
To be sure, this myth does have a big grain of truth to it. Over the first five months of 1931 -- the first five months of this five-year period -- the stock market fell 60%. You read that right: That's a 60% drop on top of a 50% drop over the previous 16 months.....According to Siegel, in fact, an investor who entered into the stock market in early 1931 was made whole again by June 1933, despite digging a 60% whole in the first five months.
MYTH 3: The stock market's recent extraordinary volatility provides a clue to the wild ride that lies ahead if we're playing out a 1930s-like script.
Actually, undeniably large as it has been, recent volatility doesn't even begin to compare to what it was like during the 1930s.
In fact, there were eight calendar months during the decade of the 1930s in which the Dow rose or fell by more than 20%......These monthly changes dwarf what has been seen in the current bear market. The biggest calendar month loss so far came last October, when the Dow fell by 14.1%. The second biggest came in February, when the Dow fell 11.7%....
....The bottom line? If we are indeed playing out a 1930s-like script, we have an incredibly wild ride ahead of us. But for those who have the intestinal fortitude to hang on, such a story would have a surprisingly happy ending.
Mark Hulbert is founder of The Hulbert Financial Digest. He is a senior columnist for MarketWatch.

My Comment. I'm sure there are others who could look at the Depression era statistics and come up to the exact opposite conclusions that Hulbert has. Irregardless I don't think anybody wants to relive that era from an economic or financial standpoint. So far this recession is mild compared to that era. One thing though that is constant with that era is that when stocks finally do recover, I believe people will be surprised as to how fast and far to the upside they do move.

Link: http://online.barrons.com/article/SB123637914471857307.html